A new UK-based initiative called Stop Gendercide is campaigning to support a Bill that will remove current doubt that sex-selective abortions are illegal in the UK and offer Parliament a chance to help women who are under pressure to have sex-selective abortions.
We encourage everyone to show their support for this initiative and LIKE the Stop Gendercide campaign on Facebook here – www.facebook.com/stopgendercide.org. For more information on the campaign, visit their website at www.stopgendercide.org
A cross-party group of UK MPs led by Fiona Bruce MP, is bringing forward a Bill to clarify that abortion for foetal sex is illegal.
The Bill makes clear that nothing in the Abortion Act 1967 permits termination of pregnancy on grounds of the sex of the unborn child.
By the time they hit 40, one third of UK women have had an abortion. Though UK law seems moderate on paper, it has been interpreted very liberally to enable free access to abortion up to 24 weeks pregnancy, and up to birth where there is a “substantial risk” or “serious handicap”.
Recently, it has emerged that the terms of the Abortion Act have been so widely interpreted that they may even permit an abortion on ground of fetal sex.
The three biggest institutions representing those who regulate and perform the majority of abortions in the UK all disagree on sex-selective abortion.
The Government argues that “abortion on the grounds of gender alone is illegal’. However, the British Medical Association disagrees, arguing that there are sometimes mental health grounds for a sex-selective abortion. The British Pregnancy Advisory (BPAS) disagrees with both the Government’s and BMA’s interpretations of the law. In their literature, still available on their website, they pose the question ‘Is abortion for reasons of fetal sex illegal under the Abortion Act?’ They answer ‘No. The law is silent on the matter’.
At the moment, nothing can be done to ensure that these organisations toe the Government line.
Now a cross party group of MPs are sponsoring a new Bill designed to remove all doubt and to offer Parliament a chance to help women who are under pressure to have sex-selective abortions.
Fiona Bruce MP for Congleton said,
“Whatever you think about abortion, most agree that the sex of the baby should not justify a termination. I have many concerns about abortion practice more generally, but it’s very good to collaborate on this important project with colleagues who do not normally share my views. The law needs to be clarified, and women who are under pressure to terminate on the grounds of sex need to be offered alternatives.”
Because of the way the law works in the UK, the legal status of sex-selective abortion is ambiguous. Although the sex of the child is not given as a ground for termination in the Abortion Act 1967, some argue that an abortion on mental health grounds could fall within the scope of the Act.
Gender abortion is a global problem. In countries where there is a strong preference for sons, tens of millions of girls have been selectively aborted – a conservative estimate given at a United Nations Population Fund presentation put the figure at 40 million in Asia and Europe alone
There is no consensus on the incidence of gender abortion in the UK.
A recent Government report found no statistically significant discrepancy in gender ratios in the UK even when the data is broken down by ethnicity (the problem is thought to be worse in some ethnic minority communities). However, studies carries out by Oxford and Imperial College academics found evidence of gender ratio skewing which they thought may be attributable to gender abortion.
Although the academics differ on the scale of the problem, there is an increasing body of first-hand testimony from UK resident women who say that they have obtained gender abortions in the UK, and are campaigning for Parliament to listen to them.
 Christophe Z Guilmoto, Sex imbalances at birth Trends, consequences and policy implications, United Nations Population Fund, Hanoi (October 2011) https://www.unfpa.org/webdav/site/global/shared/documents/Guilmoto_Revised_presentation_Hanoi_Oct2011.pdf,
 Prime Minister, Oral Answers to Questions 19 March 2014, c780 (Official Report)
 ‘We recognise that in some cases doctors may come to the conclusion that the effects of having a child of a particular gender are so severe to the physical or mental health of the pregnant woman as to provide legal and ethical justification for an abortion’ British Medical Association Press Release Abortion guidance Ignores Gender Complexity, Say BMA 27th May, 2014 http://bma.org.uk/news-views-analysis/news/2014/may/abortion-guidance-ignores-gender-complexity-says-bma
 British Pregnancy Advisory Service Britain’s Abortion Law What it says and Why (British Pregnancy Advisory Service publishers, 2012), page 8.
Latest posts by Miriam (see all)
- Official from NZ abortion lobby linked organisation Planned Parenthood haggles over baby body part prices, jokes ‘I want a Lamborghini’ - July 22, 2015
- A Guide for the Uninitiated on How to Disguise Your Pro-Abortion Lobbying - June 3, 2015
- New Study Shows That Most Pro-Lifers Are… Women and Young People - May 22, 2015