Should pro-lifers compare abortion to the Connecticut shooting?

On December 18, 2012, in Blog, by The Radical Feminist

Sandy Hook Connecticut shooting vigil 2 jpg Should pro lifers compare abortion to the Connecticut shooting?

In the past couple of days I have found myself becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the way some pro-lifers have opted to use the horrifically tragic events of the Connecticut elementary school shooting as a platform to draw attention to another horrific act – the killing of innocent unborn human beings via abortion.

As far as I am concerned, the truly pro-life response to this crisis is to mourn the loss of these innocent lives, to grieve with the survivors and relatives left behind, and, if you are so inclined, to offer up your prayers for all involved.

I am firmly convinced that this is NOT the time to be making comparisons between this tragedy and the act of abortion, and the thousands of innocent US children that it claims on a daily basis.

I say this not because I don’t think that there is some logical connection between these types of events, but rather because now is not the time for lobbying, now is the time for grieving, caring and loving.

Perhaps there will be a time in the future for such comparisons to be made (because, as I said, I do believe that there are logical connections that can be made between these events), however, by making such comparisons at this present moment in time we are effectively hi-jacking one tragic killing in order to highlight another.

By using the Connecticut shooting as a platform for activism I believe that we are trampling on the memory of those innocents who were killed, and we actually end up creating the impression that:

a) the Connecticut deaths are not as important as the deaths of children killed by abortion

OR:

b) the Connecticut deaths are not worth mourning, or shouldn’t be mourned while abortion goes unmourned in America

OR:

c) the Connecticut deaths only have meaning in comparison to abortion

I am absolutely of the mind that the first thing to cross our mind, or our Facebook wall, in the wake of such a tragedy as this should NOT be a self-serving comparison to another tragic killing (abortion). The first things that should cross our mind, and be expressed by us are horror at the events, sorrow for those lost, and solidarity with those who are left behind to mourn.

These were human persons, and of all people, we as pro-lifers should understand that their intrinsic value and worth, and the awful magnitude of their murder has nothing to do with whether or not America sanctions the killing of other human persons.

These were not objects to be used as springboards for pro-life activism, they were innocent persons. Persons just as innocent as those unborn ones killed that same day in abortion clinics across America, and we fail in our cause when we treat the victims of this shooting as anything less by our speech and conduct.

I would also suggest that we fall into a Utilitarian error when we start comparing the number of innocent lives lost in the two different acts (abortion and the Connecticut shooting), which is what I’ve seen some pro-lifers subtly doing (probably without realizing it) in the days since the killings.

The deliberate killing of several thousand innocent human beings is no more worse or terrible than the deliberate killing of 26 innocent human beings, or even the deliberate killing of just one innocent human being. Their value and worth is not found in their volume, but in the unique and profound dignity that each and every human person possesses by virtue of their unique and exceptional nature.

For me it’s pretty simple, hi-jacking someone else’s tragedy and grief in order to draw attention to our own tragedy and grief lacks a certain authenticity and humanness that should be the hallmark of genuine pro-life expression.

Like I said earlier, there will come a time when drawing the comparisons between the killing of innocents at Connecticut and the killing of innocents in US abortion clinics is appropriate, but that time is not now. Right now the truly compassionate and pro-life response is to mourn those precious innocents who were lost while standing in solidarity with those who grieve their unjust killing.

By doing that we show to the world that we truly do mean it when we say that ALL human lives have a profound value and worth, and that the spilling of ANY innocent blood is a grave injustice which must not go unnoticed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000817958877 Stella McLeod

    My understanding is that 28 people died. While I appreciate that the killer is not an innocent victim, shouldn’t we presume his mother was until proven otherwise?

    I think there is every much a connection with abortion (society devaluing life), as there is with other issues I’ve seen raised in connection with this tragedy: gun control laws; mental health care; violent video games; side effects of medication; family breakup; taking God out of schools, etc.

    People are grappling with why this tragic incident happened and I do think just focussing in on one issue (gun control) when several factors may be involved is foolish. It even occurs to me that considering the “imminent end of the world” talk that the shooter may well have thought he was being “loving” by preventing further suffering. (The latter is an “acceptable” excuse given to justify both abortion and euthanasia if the victim is disabled.) [Shortly after typing this someone on the radio mentioned that Adam and his mother were said to be "doomsday preppers".]

    In New Zealand we used to compare the number of children killed via abortion to the number of classrooms of children – thinking of course of the fact that in over five years time that would be so many less children attending school. So, yes, I am one of the people who automatically made the connection with abortion.

    • Radical Feminist

      And, as I said in my original post, there are logical connections between these two things, however I think that taking the next step of using this tragedy as a platform to lobby against abortion is where the problem lies.

      • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000817958877 Stella McLeod

        When my first born daughter, who had spina bifida, died a week after birth, one of the death notices close relatives put in subtly drew attention to the fact that babies like her get aborted. At the time, as the grieving mother, I was rather surprised but also acknowledged that it was true. A few weeks or months later I even wrote to Helen Clark, who was Minister of Health at the time, lamenting the fact that according to NZ law my baby could have been legally aborted because the extent of her abnormality was incompatible with life and that I felt the law devalued my daughter’s life. You could say I used my tragedy to lobby against abortion.

        In the USA, because they have abortion on demand, every single child regardless of how healthy they are could have been aborted. Abortion devalues the lives of all children as this father of a high school shooting victim pointed out in 2006 after the Amish school murders. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nqnyj-Z1uHU&feature=youtu.be

        • http://twitter.com/mattgillon Matt Gillon

          I guess the difference is that you were the person doing the advocating. Would you have felt the same if others had used your own baby as a poster child for the cause without allowing you time and space to grieve?

          Good on you for acting on your desire to highlight something in the wake of your tragedy and doing something constructive.

          I’m not well versed in who the current calls are coming from in the current wake of the US tragedy but I’m hazarding a guess it isn’t coming from the grieving families who lost their treasured kids. I’m glad to see pro-lifers who can provide compassion to those who are grieving without feeling like they have to use it as a platform.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000817958877 Stella McLeod

    “Many people think that I am making these comparisons to show the
    similarities of the events in question and abortion, but that is not
    really the case. I am not merely trying to show them as the same thing, I
    am trying show the horrifying fact that we don’t see them as the same
    thing.” – Bryan Kemper
    http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/should-pro-lifers-compare-abortion-to-things-like-the-connecticut-tragedy

  • http://twitter.com/mattgillon Matt Gillon

    Thanks for the article and taking the time to write.

  • Brian

    Your article is doing the same exact same thing that you say you oppose doing.

    • Miriama

      Can you please elaborate?